Bottom Line: Turmoil rocks South L.A. school named for Obama

After less than one year in operation, the principal of Barack Obama Global Preparation Academy has been transferred, sparking outrage among local education advocates. (Photo by Gary McCarthy)

By BETTY PLEASANT, Contributing Editor

Tools

  • 16 Comments
  • Print this article

There was a time when teachers and the public school system were next to God and the church in the population’s admiration and enjoyed the unwavering support of parents and the childless alike. But not anymore. And certainly not in South Los Angeles where the public school system is coming under fire like it’s public enemy number one.

Cases in point: The Los Angeles Unified School District Board’s high-handed turn-over of the public Henry Clay Middle School to the Green Dot education company last Friday, coupled with what the community views as another atrocity — the removal Tuesday of the principal of the brand new, 10-month-old and highly ballyhooed Barack Obama Global Preparation Academy.

What the school board did to Clay had already aroused so much antipathy among South L.A. residents that they organized to fight the school board, but the inner-city’s response to the school district’s action in regard to the Obama Academy has, as they say, gone viral.

It seems that the Southland’s educational power brokers — John Deasy, the new LAUSD superintendent, and George McKenna, the Local District 7 superintendent — decided last week to, first, fire Veronique Wills as principal of Obama, but later chose to transfer her to the continuation school at Fremont High School, to which she reported Tuesday. Wills’ removal, for reasons the district would only tell me is “a personnel matter,” has enraged the school’s parents, teachers and community volunteers who have worked closely with Wills since the school opened in September, and they’ve been meeting and planning protests since the Fourth of July.

A middle school, the Obama Academy, located on the corner of 46th Street and Western Avenue, was hailed as a wonderful thing when it opened last Sept. 13 with 1,300 students. It was billed as a site that would relieve the overcrowding at Foshay, Mann and Muir middle schools and provide a new age student-centered, college preparatory and career readiness curriculum emphasizing math, science, technology, world languages, diplomacy and the social and economic systems of other nations. Oh, everybody just loved it: the educators, the politicians, the parents. So, what went wrong during the academy’s 10-month existence?

According to the teachers and the parents — everything, from day one.
“The Obama Academy was under-resourced all year long,” declared Kokayi Kwa Jitahidi of the MA’AT Institute for Community Change, a group which has worked closely with the school. “All this school ever got from the school district were a lot of fancy words and ideas and nothing to bring them about. They were operating on a shoe-string budget and had to cut staff to get the place open.

“We volunteered to help keep the school clean because they didn’t even have enough janitors. Ms. Wills worked very hard to bring the basic resources to the school which the district did not provide. And even if she did have the resources, she would have needed more than 10 months to make a school work,” Jitahidi said.

One of the leaders of the protesting Obama teachers said: “The school opened in September and we didn’t even get textbooks in the classrooms until November. And when the district finally gave us some, they came without codes and we — the teachers, staff and volunteers — had to code every single textbook by hand before the students could use them.” 

Another teacher complained that while the school opened in September, it received no Title I money until January or February; that despite its 1,300 student enrollment, it was given no campus aides, had only two office technicians and a plant management staff of five people, including only two custodians.

“If we wanted a clean classroom, we had to clean it ourselves — and we did,” the teacher said. “We had parents and community people who would help us sometimes, but it was a hard year and we had a difficult time getting our school going because we never received what we needed to operate.

“But Ms. Wills was our leader and she worked tirelessly against formidable challenges. In fact, Ms. Wills, acknowledging the importance of constant parental interaction, often stayed at the school late — until 6 and 7 p.m. — to accommodate working parents who wanted to confer about their children,” the teacher said.

Another Obama teacher is quite depressed over the turn of events. “We worked hard developing the plan for this school and the district didn’t support us in carrying it. I don’t think I want to be a teacher anymore,” she said.

Many of the teachers speak of a meeting McKenna had with the Obama faculty two weeks ago at which Julie Elliot, an LAUSD associate superintendent, apologized to the faculty for the problems the staff had during its first year and pointedly apologized for the district’s failure to provide the necessary resources when the school opened.

She said the district will make sure nothing like that ever happens to a new school again. Elliot is also reported to have told the 30 or so teachers present at the meeting that she found no fault with the academy and that no “corrections” would be dispensed.

“Imagine our shock to learn after Elliot’s speech that Ms. Wills — our principal, our leader — was being fired,” another teacher said. “They just keep playing us and blaming us. What do they want us to do? I believe we were set up to fail,” she added.

McKenna did not return my calls for an interview; Deasy was out of town, and LAUSD board member Marguerite LaMotte said: “While I’ve heard a great deal about this matter this week, I do not know the facts surrounding it. I have to investigate and ask questions of both sides to determine what has been done and why and whether it was fair to the people involved and in the best interest of the school.”

As far as Jitahidi is concerned, everything about this stinks. “Nobody knows anything, yet inner-city schools and their personnel are under assault. We’re all scratching our heads about this. Decisions are being made by unknown people for hidden reasons without input from the people. Coupled with Clay, this business at Obama is part of a continuing pattern of disrespect by the school district that targets and adversely impacts Black schools,” Jitahidi concluded.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

kacey said on Saturday, Sep 24 at 10:07 PM

The District and its Latina led board are intent on destabilizing the public schools in the neediest and poorest areas of L.A. It's part of the "shock doctrine" and the grasp of the corporate culture that will define the future of L.A/ and the U.S. That's what happened in Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, the USSR, South Korea, and South Afrika, to name a few. What's interesting is that Latino/as have been especially complicit in these big money sell-offs. Once the prevailing system is destabilized by the neglect and undermining of its foundation by the very characters who are supposed to support it, the corporate or private forces (Green Dot, TFA, ICEF, Bright Star, CLAS, KIPP=TFA) and money grubbers swarm in to take what's left and convert (subvert) it to its own needs, i.e., to make money off a public entity, strip it of its essential functions, and sell it back to the public/taxpayers as a better product. The intent in the end is really to destroy the unions and a middle class lifestyle

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Barbara said on Sunday, Jul 17 at 3:22 PM

@Obama Prep: It sounds like they are setting your school up for reconstitution- I hate to say it but you can't trust anything LD7 says. You all will need to get militant and try some tactics that keeping the kids home and home schooling them. Money talks and it's the only thing that talks in LAUSD

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Obama Prep Speaks said on Sunday, Jul 10 at 1:38 PM

I'm part of the Obama school communtiy and I want to know, when will the District STOP this ineffective practice of abruptly changing principals when they are trying to make a difference? It makes the concept of Public School Choice a joke! Obama Prep has a PSC plan that Ms. Wills and the staff are committed to implementing. There were major obstacles this year, but as a school family under her leadership we persevered, with determination and plans for an ever improving year, next year. But, now the District pulled the rug from under us. Many said the school was set up for failure from the very beginning, and Dr. Deasy's decision to switch principals right now, just after our first year, confirms it. We thought the District wanted innovation and to get away from the status quo. Guess not. The right thing to do is to not switch principals.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Carolfrances said on Sunday, Jul 10 at 12:10 AM

As a teacher who taught in Watts for decades, I watched as teachers, students and parents were increasingly disempowered. Now in retirement, I hear about this case and am encouraged to find the educational community of this school, supported by organizations for justice, building a movement around a simple idea: the school community must be allowed - and in fact encouraged - to shape the school's reality; the administration must be there to support them.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Sasha said on Saturday, Jul 9 at 8:51 AM

LAUSD has repeatedly charged schools, principals and teachers with bogus allegations when they have a private agenda. They replace good personnel with those who use scare tactics to get teachers to perform by any means possible. They create climates of fear. They'll pour resources into schools of their friends not matter how many complaints they receive against the administrator. They target teachers who speak up. They give away schools to private businesses and we will probably never know what they were really given in return. The problem with LAUSD is not the schools but the district itself. When you dismantle something cut off the head first. Instead of getting rid of school personnel maybe you should wipe out all the personnel at the district first. Starting at the top. Mercenaries have never been effective. They only had to the problem. The problem with LAUSD is LAUSD.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Gustavo said on Friday, Jul 8 at 11:17 PM

It was a difficult task to include 6th , 7th and 8th graders immediately. A better plan for the school could have included just 6th graders who could have created the culture and Ms. Wills' wonderful vision. A grade could have been added per year. Until the third year the initial 6th graders would have become the 8th graders. I agree Ms. Wills should have been given more time with adequate resources.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Obama Prep said on Friday, Jul 8 at 10:54 PM

LAUSD and LD7 is setting this school up for failure. Another school the district will give away to a charter, which will not take all the problem students that are there now. Teachers get your resumes in order.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Maria said on Friday, Jul 8 at 2:02 PM

hahahahahaahaha ms.wills got fired thats what she get :) :p

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Eric Lee "Not SCLC shameful leader" said on Friday, Jul 8 at 1:23 PM

Clay was the second worse performing Middle school in California. Why wouldnt you change a sucky school

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Change agent said on Friday, Jul 8 at 1:16 PM

All of this is mess, If the school suck you should be replase. Marguerite Lamotte can fake dum but she knows it's time for a change. The school should had been ran by View Park Prep anyway. Study the facts on the schools in our community

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

BOGPA said on Friday, Jul 8 at 12:08 PM

Having been present at Obama this school year we came to the belief that the district was setting us up to fail. Not enough office or custodial support, using us as guinea pigs for a new "virtual" computer system that did not work, and the list could go on. The in February we finally started to see our Title One money come to the school. Slowly but surely things were starting to happen that led us to believe, maybe they don't want us to fail. At the end of a very difficult year our staff rallied around our principal and decieded to stay one more year. We had an extremely low tornover rate, virtually unheard of for middle schools. Then we get the news that they are moving our principal. Now we are left to think again...they just are setting us up to fail...Principal Wills has the right spirit and integrity to lead this school to the fullfillment of its five year plan. It is a shame that such an inspiring leader would be treated so dishonarbly by LAUSD, Dr. McKenna, and Dr. Daisey.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Janet Kelly said on Thursday, Jul 7 at 2:05 PM

I am happy the community is rallying around Ms. Wills. We need to stand up and let the powers that be know that such actions will not be tolerated in oru community. You can't hold anyone accountable when resources are lacking. This another example of how our schools get short changed in the political arena.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Jose Lara said on Thursday, Jul 7 at 8:14 AM

Thank god for the Wave in reporting stories like this. The "other" LA newspapers never write stories of importance to South LA.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Chuck said on Thursday, Jul 7 at 6:03 AM

The same arrogant high-handed tactics used in a community which couldn't defend Fremont, Jordan, Locke, Clay, Gompers. District 7 has been used as a training ground for administration, as a place to experiment when it comes to education, and as a money pit. Failed "experiments," failed financial and moral responsibility, failed leadership. Also recall the principal of Central HS #9 was removed after her first year. I guess certain "plums" go to that special network of friends.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Barbara said on Wednesday, Jul 6 at 10:32 PM

No surprises here. Local district 7 essential stole the Central and Gage new high school SRHS #2 from the teachers who wrote the plans, refusing to hire very qualified design team members as principals and then changing the plans we had written. Until the community gets really militant, nothing will change.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Jackie Preuss said on Wednesday, Jul 6 at 7:35 PM

Thank you, Ms. Pleasant for reporting the reality of what is happening to students, parents and schools under the misguided reform practices of LAUSD and Arne Duncan. Change is being implemented for the sake of change, there seems to be no viable plan in place, and it feels like the folks in charge are building the airplane while flying. None of this is the fault of the staff and parent volunteers at the school. The principal of this school needs to be returned to the school she dedicated her heart and soul to. What happened with Clay was a travesty, and what Marguerite Lamotte asserted is true: public schools are being given away to companies that many times refuse to serve students with special needs, behavioral challenges, and English Learners. I hope the community wakes up and realizes the privatization of schools benefits the very lucky few. Dr. Deasy must respect the community and their wishes because they are OUR CHILDREN.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

Los Angeles Wave and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

On Demand

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.