Bottom Line: Lurid details emerge in sexual harassment lawsuit lost by an L.A. civil rights insider

By BETTY PLEASANT, Contributing Editor

Tools

  • 16 Comments
  • Print this article

An entrepreneur and civil rights activist with close ties to the Rev. Al Sharpton, to Rep. Maxine Waters and to just about every political and religious figure in the Southland, has lost a sexual harassment and “intentional tort” battery lawsuit and is scheduled to begin a new trial continuation hearing Monday to determine the total amount of damages he must pay.

Tony Wafford, the West Coast coordinator of Sharpton’s National Action Network, who also heads Wafford Consulting and the Palms Residential Care Center, was sued last fall by one of his employees, Sharon Song Byrd, for sexual harassment and battery. At the conclusion of a nine-day trial in Superior Court, the jury found in Byrd’s favor.

Byrd held the program administrator position at the Palms Residential Care Center, from whose La Brea Avenue location Wafford ran Los Angeles County-funded AIDS/HIV programs.    

After listening to a seemingly endless litany of egregious acts by Wafford to get Byrd to have sex with him — including testimony that he took his penis out of his pants in his office and told her to “come and sit on it” — the jury awarded her all the money she sought. 

Byrd told the jury that in an angry rage at her continuous rebuff of his nasty advances, Wafford struck her on the hand and the huge diamond ring he wears caused inoperable nerve damage to her appendage. Her physicians provided court declarations as to the severity of the injuries to her hand. Then the jury found that, yes, Byrd had been severely and continuously sexually harassed by Wafford; yes, he had committed a battery when he hit her and yes, he will pay all her medical bills and for the services of a psychologist to restore her emotional health.

Wafford, who is said to have fired the attorney who lost his case, is expected to defend himself Monday at 10 a.m. in Dept. 39 in the downtown courthouse in another trial set to assess the non-economic damages he will pay Byrd — such as for pain and suffering, emotional distress and the like.

I asked Jeffrey Cowan, Byrd’s Santa Monica-based attorney, why Wafford, who was accused of battery, is not in jail. Cowan explained that while paramedics were summoned to the scene following Wafford’s attack on Byrd, and a lengthy LAPD police report was taken of the incident, she was informed that a report needed to be made to the Sheriff’s Department.

Cowan said that report was made, but it ended up missing. “We held a mini-trial about that missing report,” Cowan said. “Criminal proceedings were never implemented against Wafford because the Sheriff’s Department never issued a formal report.”

Oh, and by the way, Wafford is married to a captain in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

Attempts to reach Wafford for comment were unsuccessful, as the telephone number on his Wafford Consulting letterhead is no longer in service. 

I did manage to reach several people who know Wafford, chief among whom is activist Najee Ali, who was once also closely aligned with Sharpton. Ali said he broke ranks with Sharpton because of Wafford, and as to this case, Ali said, among other things, “I am not surprised by the verdict.”

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Media said on Saturday, Jul 16 at 4:05 PM

@COMMON SENSE, well that can't be right! If its a civil suit and he lost, the jurors would award damages at the end of the trial. Maybe she wasn't awarded damages and she's going back for an award . . .

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

CommonSense said on Friday, Jul 15 at 9:51 PM

@Media...they're going back to court for the judgment. Think of it as sentencing. Wafford has already lost the case, the only thing left to be decided is the amount in damages Song Byrd will be awarded. Good for her.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Read the story said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 5:44 PM

They are going back to court to determine the damages that are part of the triple damages laws.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

truth said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 12:24 PM

Come sit on it??? What type of cmmunity leader preys on woman.. Sharpton should make that sexual pervert resign ! Betty keep exposing these clowns !

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Women against perverts. said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 12:08 PM

If Tony is such a great guy, then why did he lose the case? Sharon is a great sister. But Wafford is a well known pervert, who is also a dead beat dad ! My friend dated him while he was married, so he's also a cheater on his loving wife, who's a fool to stay with him !

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friend of Sharon said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 10:37 AM

I hate to see my friend going through this with all these comments. Sharon, tell the truth, you know this didn't happen. I told you this would not work! But, I'm still your friend til the end! Just tell the truth!

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Fight-ON to be RIGHT ON said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 10:27 AM

Is this the same Sharon Song Byrd that sued 3 other people for sexual harassment and battery? If so, Mr. Wafford has more character than Eddie Long!! FIGHT ON Brotha for RIGHT!!!!!

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Sexy Sister said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 10:19 AM

Thanks for the positive comments! I know this Brother and I would "sit on it" any day! But, he has ALWAYS been respectful of his marriage AND his WIFE! Stay strong Tony! If you ever get divorced, call me!!!!

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Respected Person said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 10:06 AM

An entrepreneur and civil rights activist with close ties to the Rev. Al Sharpton, to Rep. Maxine Waters and to just about every political and religious figure in the Southland. WTF!! Wouldn't you think these people would know SOMETHING about this person? Why didn't you ask them for your story?

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Convicted Felon said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 10:01 AM

Najee Ali, did your verdict surprise you? (lol). Ms. Byrd, there are a lot of people sitting in prison today that's innocent. I hope you can sleep at night!

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Just Courious? said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 9:48 AM

I'm not a lawyer, but if she won, and was awarded to know that she won, why is she taking this person back to court?

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Swingline said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 9:41 AM

Ms. Pleasant, don't you find it odd that in your story you say that you reached out to several people in an effort to get background info on Mr. Wafford and the only source you quoted was the words of a convicted felone. Could it be that Mr. Ali's break from Sharpton had nothing to do with Mr. Wafford, but his two year stint in state prison?

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

My Black Brothers said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 9:31 AM

Black men, Black men! This sick society is attacking from all directions! Stay strong Tony, ALL Black Sistas ain't after an opportunity!! This sista should be ashamed of herself!

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

MEDIA . . .? said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 8:37 AM

My question is . . . Ms. Plesant, how much did you get paid to write this story? This is so sad! First, your article does not make sense. If this man lost a case, why is he going back to court? Also, if there were several days of court, with an attorney, and because the end result was NOT why this woman desired, MONEY, I would go back and represent myself as well., Lastly, here we go again, we get this from white ppl and black ppl the bottom line is ALWAYS MONEY!! Ms. Byrd, GET A JOB!!

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Black power said on Thursday, Jul 14 at 7:44 AM

Come sit on it?? Sounds like Tony who's a married man is a sexual deviant ! Sharpton must be a fool to have this man in charge of any thing !

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Friend said on Wednesday, Jul 13 at 9:39 PM

Hey Tony is a great person! It has alot more to this story that you have reported.

Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

Los Angeles Wave and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

ON DEMAND

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.